Feat/composing matching rules #405
Conversation
|
As I was in that space, I also added support for the matching rule definition expressions. So you can also do {
"pact:matcher:type": "eachKey(matching(regex, '\\w{3}-\\d+', 'AUK-155332')), eachValue(matching(type, ''))",
}Just note that using references ( |
This is more an implementation detail. The language implementations can choose to use this form or use the FFI functions directly. The compatibility suite should assert the behavior, regardless. |
Yeah it was more the point of being able to add multiple matchers to a single field. Ditto expressions. This looks good though! |
Implements #399
TLDR - This allows an array to be specified with the
pact:matcher:typeattribute to be able to have multiple matching rules.For example, you could do something like (just making this up, may not be valid):
{ "pact:matcher:type": [ { "pact:matcher:type": "regex", "regex": "\\w{3}-\\d+" }, { "pact:matcher:type": "include", "value": "XYZ" } ] }